Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

Secular Humanity - August 2008

It's been said that a McCain presidency would be a "Bush third term" although it may be hard to imagine, he may actually be worse. He has come full away from any pretensions of being a "Maverick" and gone straight into Bush neo-conservatism. And in a sort of oneupmanship, he is even more pro-war and internationally belligerent. His economic proposals will ensure what is a downturn/recession will become a major depression. He cannot win on the issues. His campaign knows that to approach issues in a real manner (something beyond drill here, there, everywhere) is a death sentence. So he is going negative. But he is also being exposed as a liar, a cheat, and in a funny story of stealing words from a Noble laureate, a plagiarist.


John McCain has said Barack Obama will raise taxes on people making over 42,000 dollars per year. Truth is, Obama will lower taxes there. He will raise, and should raise, taxes on those making more than 250,000. John McCain says he supports "the troops." He supports sending troops to war, not giving them equipment or assistance when the get home. McCain has voted consistently against veteran proposals. McCain is lying about "the surge" knowing full well that violence has subsided primarily because of the so-called "Sunni awakening" and a cease fire ordered by Muqtada al-Sadr.

John McCain has always tried to come across as against government corruption. His campaign team is chock full of lobbyist, including those who have lobbied for dictators around the globe. One of his most trusted advisers is Randy Scheunemann, who is a lobbyist for the government of Georgia. Funny, after Mr. Scheunemann and his partner got 800,000 dollars from Georgia McCain came out so very strongly in support of that government. It's also important to remember, in light of the current banking crisis, John McCain is no stranger to financial scandal. Remember the "Keating five?"


At the Saddleback forum held by Pastor Rick Warren John McCain was supposedly in a "cone of silence" but was actually in his limo on the way to the event during the first half of the event (when Barack Obama was answering the same questions McCain would get) and was in the green room waiting for the second half. He could have been listening live for all we know. It's bad enough that the first forum between the candidates was in a religious setting, but that it was a cheat is disgraceful.

And now it comes out that John McCain can't even use his own prisoner stories. Seems he is borrowing from a Noble laureate. He's already been caught lifting speeches directly from Wikipedia. At the Saddleback forum he once again told a story he has recently "remembered" from his time as a POW. As it turns out, it is exactly the same story Russian author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. The "cross in the dirt" story that McCain now tells as being part of his POW experience is remarkably similar to what Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn wrote about one of his experiences he endured in a Soviet gulag.

McCain also claimed that the song he said was a favorite, ABBA's "Dancing Queen," is so important to him because he isn't interested in music published since then. Funny thing is, the song was put out two years after he got back. That really isn't important, except that it shows a pattern. Making up one's history to make it look more dramatic is nothing new, of course. We all remember Hillary Clinton's remarks about coming under sniper fire.

With John McCain the re-workings run deep. He once recognized leaders of the religious right as being agents of intolerance and now openly courts their blessing. He once noted how unjust the Bush tax cuts are and now wants to not only keep them, but to deepen them. He has made it clear that his presidency would be business as usual, pushing the neo-con agenda. My, how the "Maverick" has fallen.
66
Vote
   


Despite what John McCain said in his closing remark about having the forum in a church, America was not founded as a Judeo-Christian country. Our founders were very, very, concerned about the mixing of church and state. The religious right will tell you America was founded to give religious freedom, but the truth is the colonies already had it. England did not force anyone in the states to go to any particular church. The revolution was much more a revolt against corporate power (over tea, first, then other issues) than religion. But that's not what troubles me the most.

You can find comments all over the place about how the night went, and who won or lost. My contention is that America lost. With so many issues at hand, what is a major forum doing in a church? And no matter how popular he is or how many people go to his mega-church, what is Rick Warren doing playing the role of potential king maker? What kind of America are we living in? Are we so hung up on a religious litmus test that this is the kind of election we are going to have?

As evangelical leaders go, Pastor Rick Warren is alot more palatable than most. He realizes that global climate change is a critical issue. He is at the fore when it comes to opposing the genocide in Darfur. Still, his place is not to hold a forum between presidential candidates. A "wall of separation" needs to be just that. I wonder, when can we expect a secular forum, where religion is not an issue, and the faith of the candidates is something they hold (or don't hold) in privacy? When can we have an America where someone who doesn't bow at the evangelical altar can have a chance to be president?

No matter how you "feel," don't you realize that to involve religion so deeply in politics is never a good thing? What's the difference between tonight's forum in a church and one in a mosque? All Americans who truly understand what freedom of religion means should be outraged. I know I am.
90
Vote
   


Mounting evidence from all corners show that Mr. Bush and his administration completely and totally lied and manipulated the people and Congress into taking on his folly that is Iraq. They forged letters, changed intelligence reports, withheld information that would suggest an invasion wasn't needed while trumping up anything that might point to Iraqi culpability, and attacked anyone who didn't come along.

John McCain has decided to hitch his wagon to the dogs of war too. He has completely accepted the Bush line on Iraq. He is even more bellicose than Bush about Iran. And now it comes out he is deeply involved with the events leading up to the Georgian army attacks that led to the current crisis. And why was Karl Rove just recently in the region? And why are McCain's lapdogs, Joe Lieberman and Lindsey Graham, going to Georgia?

Is it the expected "October Surprise," come early? There is alot of evidence to support that assertion. The most glaring is the fact that John McCain's chief foreign policy adviser is on the dole from the Georgian government. In a span of time covering 3 1/2 years Randy Scheunemann and his partner lobbied McCain and his staff on issues involving Georgia while getting paid about 800,000.00 from the Georgian government. And yes, that's the same Randy Scheunemann who ran the so-called Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, a group set up in 2002 to push for an invasion of Iraq.

Is it any wonder McCain has taken such a pro-Georgian stance? Blustering loudly about Russia, saying at a speech that "we are all Georgians," bringing up the point that if Georgia was in NATO (as he strongly pushed for) the treaty would require us and the other NATO countries to respond militarily.

But his most ironic (and idiotic) statement would have been laughable if he wasn't so serious. "In the 21st Century Nations don't invade other Nations." Perhaps Grandpa Simpson doesn't remember that although they have been going on along time, the "wars" in Afghanistan and Iraq began in the 21st Century.

As for the Russian/Georgian conflict, it is important to remember the Georgians fired first. The Georgian army blew into the Ossetia region with little regard for civilians and with alot of firepower. There were even reports of Georgian soldiers throwing hand grenades into cellars where civilians had taken refuge from the assault. Whatever you think of the level of Russian response, it's important to note the initial provocation.

A good analogy for Americans to understand might be this - what if a heavily armed group of Mexican soldiers moved into West Texas, putting claim to El Paso and the surrounding area? Would it be enough justification if they said they were reclaiming what was theirs? Or would America respond with overwhelming force? Regardless of what you might hear on FOX News, the Russian's, at least initially, were protecting the people of South Ossetia.

Once they ran through the contested regions, they moved against Georgian positions deeper inside the country and acted to diminish the ability of the Georgian military to make war. Where might we have heard of such a tactic before...when we drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait? Maybe the Russians thought "shock and awe" was a good idea too.


It is looking more and more like the Georgian president decided to "poke the bear" with expectations that America would rise to his support. And John McCain isn't one to disappoint a big money pal like that, right?

When Condolezza Rice visited Georgia in July, did she leave the impression that Saakashvili was getting a green light? Did the Georgian president feel he could move with confidence? The Georgian army has been getting trained by Americans for years. Georgia sent 2,000 troops to Iraq in support of the Bush debacle there. Did he feel that America would rush to his aid?

The way many neo-cons are talking, they can't seem to contain themselves over the possibility of war with Russia. It's the war-profit paradise, baby! And there's also the fundamentalist Christians who see a war with Russia as critical to the return of their Jesus.

Now it's time for the Russians to back down, and let the French brokered peace deal take hold. As for America, Bush and McCain need to stop sounding so much like neighborhood bullies who have had their bluff called. As for our election, what it comes down to is easy enough. If you like war - I mean really, really, like war- John McCain is your man.
59
Vote
   


Like children who don't understand it's for their own good to be dragged out of the toy section at the Wal-Mart, conservatives are kicking and screaming and making it harder for Americans to move ahead on so many important fronts. They don't like all kinds of important ideas, like fighting global warming and finally putting an end to the Iraq occupation. They can't see the glaringly obvious need to move rapidly away from oil in whatever area we can. They are entrenched in very bad ideas with bad consequences for everyone.

If the stakes weren't so high, we wouldn't have to act so boldly. But inaction on the important fronts are very much endangering far more than just opinions. The very future of our planet is at stake. Now that's not like a Christian end-time thing. The planet will go on. Humans will go on. But what kind of world will it be? How many millions will have to die


[ Click here to read more ]
55
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
8 Posts
11 Posts
212 Posts dating from July 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Jeff Musall's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Jeff Musall
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]