Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Secular Humanity - November 2008

Shame on Black Friday!

November 30th 2008 22:58
Sure, there is good and bad in everything. "Black Friday" is no exception. Everyone loves a deal, and stores try to outdo each other every year. Still, what does such a massive display of consumerism say about us as a society? Most especially in light of the mob trampling death at a Long Island Wal-Mart. What the hell? Is that sale so important, so vital, that "anything goes?"

We have all heard of trampling deaths as crowds attempt to escape disaster, or move through a mass religious experience, or even at sporting events. Can you imagine, being killed by those who are in such a hurry to get somewhere, they don't give a damn if you live or die, and mow right over you? And now imagine that even to be nothing but a good price on a sub-standard TV or computer. Is that a hallmark of a sane group of people?


What kind of mindset does a person have to be in to become so involved with getting into a store that they are literally OK with trampling right over someone to do it? And then to complain, as some did, when the store was forced to close because of the death? Shame on the shoppers, and shame on Wal-Mart. It's kind of like the old saying people tell children "it's all fun and games, until someone loses an eye." Well, someone got killed. The store should have either had adequate security in place or not opened. If the crowd was becoming unruly, the store should have remained closed. And everyone involved should step forward and face the music. Of course that's not going to happen, but at least, hopefully, they are shamed enough to reform their behavior.

Some will say it was just an accident, an unfortunate turn of events that just happened. Wrong! The death was a direct result of greed gone wild. The greed of individual shoppers who had no regard for what was going on, and the greed of the store for ignoring concerns and letting the mob run. All involved share guilt, and should share in responsibility.


To a more abstract thought - what is it that drives "Black Friday?" Just the rampant consumerism of the Christmas phenomenon, or is there more? Some live for the day, many hate it and won't go anywhere near a store. I tend to the latter, although I did make some buys on the day a couple of times. To me it seems to be a celebration of the lesser. There is so much more we could do as individuals and as a society. Wouldn't it be something if there was a day in the holiday season devoted to helping others? And please, don't say Christmas is that day.

The trend the last few years has been for retailers to open earlier and offer more "doorbusters" to get the first shoppers. Some stores have even gone to opening at Midnight. Is it time to end the madness? Perhaps towns and cities could pass restrictions saying a store can't open any earlier then it's regular hours. And that they must have policies in place to deal with unruly crowds. And most importantly - if enough of us ignore the sales, Black Friday will become a thing of the past. Stores would be forced to have sales that were longer. Would that be such a bad thing?

And perhaps we could even find better things to do with ourselves our time, and our money.
43
Vote
   


No company should be "too big to fail"

November 21st 2008 05:56
The debate rages as to whether or not the "big three" American auto makers should get a bailout. A 700B dollar "rescue plan" was already thrown at the financial industry. First question might be, if 25B can save the big three, just how deep in the crapper was the financial sector? But that's not the point I'm addressing. In my view, any company deemed to be "too big to fail" is too big to exist. Any corporation falling into that category needs to be either broken up or nationalized.

If you haven't heard the term, "too big to fail" has been used to describe companies whose failure would so damage the economy (or the reasoning goes) that to allow them to fail is not an option. The billions recently poured into the AIG hole are a good example. The ramifications of failure are made out to be much worse than any possible outcome arising from a bailout.

Besides being patently unfair - what about the companies that are not in trouble? Where's their benefit? And what about those that will fail by the thousands in the coming months, but aren't considered big enough to care about? The whole idea of bailout rubs most people the wrong way, to say the least. And it is worth noting how differently the bailouts of a predatory (and quite likely criminal) financial services industry and a badly mismanaged and short-sighted auto group are being looked at.

Of course the conservobots want to blame labor. They say the reason Detroit auto-makers are in such dire straits is because of the high cost of labor. On the surface, it seems true. Car building is still a family-wage job, a dying thing in today's America. In truth, the biggest cost of labor that pushes up the cost of car production is health care. That's another reason I can't understand how any big corporations would be opposed to universal single-payer health care.

The biggest threats against American auto-makers are "free trade" policies, lack of foresight, and the absence of government leadership when it comes to adapting to present/future needs. The last thing we need to do as Americans is to vilify a portion of the working class that still is able to demand a living wage. If only that were more widespread. Here's some logic to consider - if more Americans were paid living wages, Detroit could be expected to sell more cars, eh?

But back to my main point - if a company whose failure represents a threat to the entire economy exists, that in itself is a threat. Teddy Roosevelt broke up monopolies, as did F.D.R. The most recent big example is "Ma Bell," which was broken down into regional phone companies. Perhaps the industry most in need currently is big oil. Screaming to be broken up there!

Or even better, (in my opinion) nationalized. We are all aware of how important energy supply is to our economy and our national security. We are willing to spend billions upon billions to defend oil routes and "secure" oil producing countries. Why are we so willing to give all that to big oil? If we accept that energy is of national importance, why do we not have a unified national energy policy? One that instead of heaping billions of profit on CEO's and major stockholders invested in alternative energy? I know many will argue against nationalization. But how can you argue against at least a breakup?

Whatever solution we ultimately reach, big companies that get into big trouble and then want big bailouts need to be reigned in. It's no way to run a company, and it's no way to run an economy!
57
Vote
   


Same-sex marriage - Why do you care?

November 21st 2008 04:30
Three states passed ballot measures this election cycle attempting to put into law discrimination. They joined the regrettable club of states in recent elections that have done the same thing, writing bigotry into law while hiding it behind a veil of "defending marriage." Funny, those who are so in defense of marriage are often the same who so proudly claim America as being "the freest country" or something similar. The freedom they so claim to cherish is only the freedom to be like them. Or only slightly different.

Surely, same-sex couples are far too "different" to be included in the liberty so proclaimed. To imagine that two people may love in a way not sanctioned by another person's belief system, and that regardless of any consideration of rights or justice their love is to be denied the same respect others demand, that's freedom? How does a society call itself advanced while holding to arcane ideals?

Don't get me wrong, the 2008 election was a watershed event. The first African-American president. A near super-majority for Democrats. An almost across the board rejection of neo-conservatism and the ill-advised policy schemes that movement hatched. A realization by the majority of Americans that they were duped by the false promise of "trickle down" and the legacy of Ronald Reagan. The diminished power of the South as the West moves to the left. Of course the conservative movement is stil alive, but it is not well.

Still, the passing of anti-gay marriage measures, most especially in normally more progressive-minded California, dissappoints. But to those who were taken aback, I say your time is near. The wall will come down.

And to those who rejoiced, I ask this - why? Why do care? I mean really - why? Don't tell me it's because of your faith, not unless you are following all the other mundane and out-of-date orders and instructions found throughout the bible. If you are just picking and choosing, you have no case. Cut to the chase, please. Why do you really care? Why is it such an important issue that you feel compelled to, as a movement, spend millions of dollars that could have benefited the needy to screw the thumb of your beliefs down on others?

In a world where there can be so much suffering and despair, why must we deny the promise of love and hope? Are some of us so threatened by the different, by those not like us, that we will continue to say to them your love is less, your caring is less, your very being is less? It's time that as a society we declare we are better than that.
100
Vote
   


Seems some of the locals in the town of Marshall, North Carolina, weren't too taken with the dancing style of one Rebecca Willis. Apparently, Willis would dance at the local hall in a manner deemed not appropriate by some of the town officials, who banned her for life. Apparently (gasp!) they could, at times see her "undergarments" and stated that members of the community had complained about her sexually provocative dance style.

The ban was issued in December of 2000, so it took some time for the settlement to come through. Terms are that she still can't ever go to the dance hall. Personally, I can't see that bothering her too much. If it were me, I take the money and move somewhere in the current century. Funny, I saw the news story about an hour after seeing part of the 80's classing movie Footloose on television. Uptight towns, eh


[ Click here to read more ]
68
Vote
   


As reported by The New York Times, the federally appointed judiciary has become quite stacked under George W. Bush. Ignore conservative yap traps who cry about "activist liberal judges" who have, in their opinion, control of the American courts. The facts show quite a different story. According to the Times report about 62 percent of judges serving by the end of the Bush presidency are conservative.

The Times goes on to report that not only will 62 percent of the appointed judiciary be conservative when Barack Obama is sworn in, they are especially young and on the more conservative side of the scale. They will have influence for decades. The conservative appointees also control 10 of the 13 circuit courts. And the neo-cons want the other three


[ Click here to read more ]
73
Vote
   


Obama wins! Obama wins!

November 5th 2008 04:06
The race looked early on like it might follow the path of the last two presidential contests, coming down to the wire in one or two states with the predictably blue staying blue and the always red staying red. Then came New Mexico. Then came Ohio. Once those two states broke, the path for McCain became virtually insurmountable. The McCain campaign went even more downhill from there. The Blue Wave rose, digging deeper into the south - and even more important to the future, the west.

When Iowa was called for Obama the country moved away even more from the conservative cliff. America is sending a message to itself and the world - no more would we go down the same destructive path. Change. A simple word, a sometimes overused word - and a very apt way to describe the Obama campaign. Change, it is a comin


[ Click here to read more ]
85
Vote
   


At just a little after 4 p.m. West Coast time, Pat Buchanan made a statement that could well prove to be the call of the night. He said we could be on the "cusp of a new liberal era" here in America. He compared the 2008 election to that of 1932, which brought Franklin Roosevelt to the presidency. There are alot of parallels, for sure. The economy is in turmoil, and we have a Republican Party very ill-equipped to deal with it. In fact, most Americans now realize the conservative movement caused a great deal of the turmoil.

Also, we have a Democratic candidate who has energized the country like no one in decades. Not all of the energy has been in support, of course - but it has been palpable and electric. Barack Obama may well prove to be the next Roosevelt, guiding the country to a more progressive and democratic future from the ashes of the Bush presidency - just as Roosevelt did after Hoover


[ Click here to read more ]
41
Vote
   


On November 1st the Christian fanatic movement known as "The Call" held a gathering at San Diego's Qualcomm Stadium in what the movement describes as a "decisive last stand" for their version of morality and theocracy in America. The movement is on the ropes, sure - but it is still very dangerous, and still needs to fought - against with energy and knowledge. One of the tag lines used for "The Call" in San Diego is "as California goes, so goes the rest of the nation." Here's hoping they are correct. Californians look like they will reject the hate measure known as Proposition 8.

"The Call" is a movement that began when a Christian fundamentalist by the name of Lou Engle was motivated by the success of the openly misogynist men's movement, The Promise Keepers. Seeing the potential in stadium size gatherings (especially for fund raising) Engle organized the first "Call" in Washington, D.C. in September of 2000. That initial rally drew huge crowds, and the movement was born. The most recent incarnation of theocratic calling in San Diego wasn't nearly as successful. The event lasted 12 hours and people could come and go, but the stadium was never even half full


[ Click here to read more ]
58
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
7 Posts
1 Posts
220 Posts dating from July 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Sleepy Coder's Blogs

5207 Vote(s)
14 Comment(s)
85 Post(s)
Moderated by Sleepy Coder
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]